On 11/10/2010 10:52 AM, Andy Pugh wrote: > On 10 November 2010 14:15, Mark Wendt<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> The compiler would see that first statement as a short circuit eval, and >> always correctly evaluate it as your second form. >> > How about: > > if(new_in&& new_in -= start_in) > > ? If it's C code, and new_in = 0, new_in -= start_in will not be evaluated. If new_in is greater than or equal to 1, it would then evaluate the value of new_in to the decremented value of start_in. If that value is is not equal, the statement is false, and it will return false. (I think... ;-))
Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
