On 11/10/2010 11:26 AM, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> Mark Wendt wrote:
>> On 11/10/2010 10:52 AM, Andy Pugh wrote:
>>> On 10 November 2010 14:15, Mark Wendt<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The compiler would see that first statement as a short circuit
>>>> eval, and
>>>> always correctly evaluate it as your second form.
>>>>
>>> How about:
>>>
>>> if(new_in&& new_in -= start_in)
>>>
>>> ?
>> Oops, slight boo-boo on the last reply. The second new_in would be
>> assigned the value of the decremented start_in and would be evaluated as
>> true if that value is greater than or equal to 1, and be evaluated as
>> false if that value is 0.
> Non-zero, actually. A negative integer value is not false. (false ==
> 0, true == !0)
> (AFAIK :) )
> - Steve
Steve,
Yes, you're "absolute"ly right... ;-)
Mark
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a
Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your
business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
