On 11/10/2010 08:40 AM, Andy Pugh wrote: > On 10 November 2010 13:22, Mark Wendt<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Okay, I see I'm not being clear on what I'm trying to say here. >> > I think you are being clear, but are answering the wrong question. > However this is only my interpretation of the question, so it is > equally likely that I am the one answering the wrong question (and I > don't know how clear I am being). > > >> C syntax knows that the&& or || needs to be evaluated before the >> conditional operator in the second expression to determine if the second >> expression is even evaluated if the first expression is false. >> > Yes, I am not disputing that. What I was saying was that operator > precedence determines what the second expression of the&& is, ie > whether it is (new_in) or (new_in != start_in). > > At least, I rather hope that is the case...
Okay, the answer is 42... ;-) Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
