22 квітня 2012 р. 19:04 Peter C. Wallace <p...@mesanet.com> написав:

> What are your tuning values? looks like some of the error could be tuned
> out with FF1
>

I noticed that too... after the screenshot was sent.
Is the following correct?
FF0 - velocity
FF1 - acceleration
FF2 - jerk
That is FF0 can fight f-error at high speed, FF1 when
accelerating/decelerating, FF2 helps eliminate transien peaks?
How do I use torque PID? Does it make sense here?
Encoder velocity is calculated each servo period, isn't it? Then I guess D
noise is caused by 5um encoder, each 5um step results in certain velocity
peak (5um/250us servo period=0.02m/s) which cause compensatory move and so
on. Strange, but increasing servo period can decrease noise too? Anyways,
next time I use 1um and it should decrease noise 5 times.

I will continue tuning later today, now installing all motors. And the
encoder signals still can't pass through 7i39. Can it be some levels
incompatibility?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to