From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Emc-users] Sherline Mill 5410 and EMC2
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 20:04:03 +0000
> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:54:44 -0600
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Sherline Mill 5410 and EMC2
>
> On 06/24/2012 11:00 AM, Robot Abzar Team wrote:
> > I purchased a 5410 cnc-ready with 8760 driver box . and try to make the
> > configuration by myself ,
>
> Is there a reason you don't want to you use the known-good Sherline
> config that ships with LinuxCNC? It might at the very least be a good
> starting place for customization.
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Kuzminsky
>
Well how he got a config matters little if the underlying problem is say the
parallel port or realtime.
Did you do a latency test?
When using the stepconfig program did you try the stepper test?
Did it work?
Can use see if the parallel port is outputting _any_ signals?
I few general things come to mind:
-you don't have the realtime version of linuxcnc - but the stepper test would
have failed.
-your parallel port address is wrong.
the stepper test is your benchmark - if it doesn't move in the step test, it
won't move anywhere
else. (though the opossite is not necessarily true!)
Chris M
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
