On 15.02.13 13:10, andy pugh wrote:
> On 15 February 2013 12:48, Erik Christiansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I only want to use it on a hobbing and dividing gadget, so might get
> > away with belt drive within the 75N limit, but only if I only ever use
> > half of its torque, given your figures. No, that would use up the whole
> > allowance in the torque force! I can pretension to 37N, and use 1/4 of
> > the motor torque, IIUC
> 
> I don't think that the forces are additive. The torque will tighten
> one run of the belt and loosen the other. Only when the "torque force"
> is higher than the pre-tension will the radial load increase.
> (equivalent to bolt preload)

Many thanks, Andy. that is good news.

> Bigger pulleys reduce the "torque force"

Yes, that began to sink in when I ran my mind over your 10 mm radius,
3 Nm, 300 N example. You're right, finding room for bigger pulleys
beats the alternative.

> The rating is at 20mm from the flange, it should be higher closer to
> the bearings.

Yes, if the major factor is bending of the cantilevered 1/4" shaft,
then there's something to win there. From one of your other finds, a pdf
on bearings, I've cottoned onto the inverse proportionality of bearing
load and life.

> Worst-case you have to replace the bearings every decade...

And if the whole motor, that's $6.90 per year. I think you've cut to the
core of how to proceed.

Erik

-- 
Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to