Perhaps I'm confused about G64?  From the docs:

G64 is just blending and the naive cam detector is not enabled.  G64 and
G64 P0 tell the planner to sacrifice path following accuracy in order to
keep the feed rate up.  ...  G64 P0 has the same effect as G64 alone
(above), which is necessary for backward compatibility for old G Code
programs.

I'll try the small value for G64 instead.  I'm not concerned about accuracy
in this application - .005" would be fine.

I'll definitely have a look at the new trajectory planner too!


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Viesturs Lācis <[email protected]>wrote:

> 2014-04-11 22:15 GMT+03:00 Rod Fitzsimmons Frey <[email protected]>:
>
> > I've set G64 P0, which I think should eliminate motion mode concerns?
>
>
> P0 means that max allowed deviation from defined path in order to maintain
> velocity is equal to as much as total zero, so it really eliminates not
> only concerns about motion mode, but also any options to try to maintain
> the velocity. Try increasing it to something like 0,02 and see, if it is
> better.
>
> I would say that this particular case is a perfect guinea pig for the new
> trajectory planner :)
>
> Viesturs
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Put Bad Developers to Shame
> Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
> Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
> Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment 
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to