On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:37 AM Nicklas Karlsson <
nicklas.karlsso...@gmail.com> wrote:

> No not interested in any of the above more than possible what you write
> about integration.
>
> That's fine, it takes a lot of study to move past experimentation with
PID.  And the literature is full of dead ends. The question I have about
putting the integrator at the model error is how that would drive a steady
state positioning error to zero.  Seems like your measurement and model
could be forced to agreement without driving the positioning error to
zero.  Of course, I don't understand your system at all, so I could be
wrong.  In general, putting integrators into a system adds instability
because it's a marginally stable dynamic element.   Even if it does just
remain an integrator in the closed loop system, there is always the issue
of windup.
Eric

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to