On Friday 05 June 2020 17:05:45 Chris Albertson wrote:

> First off the motor is limited to 3 Nm or whatever.   It can not crush
> plastic.   The worst case a pulley will see is a stalled out drive
> motor and after the motor stops it can not pull harder.   So maybe "10
> pounds max" is all the part can ever see.
>
> That said what you want to adjust is the "wall thickness".   With a
> 0.4 mm nozzle you can make the walls as thick as you like in multiples
> of 0.4mm. Cura's default is 0.8mm but I find going to 1.6mm is good
> and makes very strong parts.   2.0 mm is over kill.
>
> Then behind the wall is infill and this can be 10% or even 100% solid.
>  More is stronger but very little is gained after 40% infill density. 
> You can double the print time by settig to 80% not little is gained. 
> The hub is the weak link, not the infill.
>
> One thing to turn on is "connect infill lines" as this structurally
> connects infill to the walls.   Also "print alternate extra wall" will
> do the same.   With this you can use 1.2mm walls and be stronger and
> lighter. Do it both ways and look at Preview.  1.2mm wall with those
> to settings is best. as it gives you a better designed 1.6mm wall.
>
> Same applies to "skin"   Skin is just a wall that is parallel to the
> build plate.   going to 1.0mm skin is enough for these small parts. 
> 1.2mm adds a lot of print time.
>
> You can specify 5mm walls but the print time goes up and the motor
> can't crush a 1.6mm wall.
>
> I print rings that slip over 24mm steel hubs and my rings are about
> 6mm thick so a 1.6mm inside wall and 1.6mm inside wall only leave a
> few mm for infill on a 40T pulley and my 30T pulleys come out solid.
>
> But if you try one of these with a 9mm "D" hole on a motor and try and
> test it, the "D" fails and the set screws fail and the 9mm hols become
> 9,5mm bt the teeth are like-new.    Even with 1.2mm walls the belts
> skip teeth and strip hub-hols before the teeth fail.
>
> As said by everyone ALWAYS look layer by layer at Cura preview.  You
> can see every line the printer will make.  Yes do check the depth of
> the wall behind the teeth but the stress at the hub is about 5X
> greater.     Look in preview that overhangs are supported
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 5:34 AM Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> 
wrote:
> > After doing that one, i took the right post slider loose and
> > loosened its fit on the vertical, as I noted there were Z movements
> > that weren't making to the other end of the bar.
> >
> > And raised the tension in the x belt which turned out to be slack
> > enough it was just laying on the right end idler pulley.
> >
> > But before I try another 10 hour print, I'd like to see an improved
> > much better filled tooth profile, my guess is that its 10% or less,
> > no high strength fill behind what might be called teeth.  I'd like
> > to see a 100% fill for at least 4mm behind the teeth, but cura isn't
> > doing any of that.  Those teeth are 100% crushable all the way to
> > the bore reinforcement.
> >
> > And I can't make the 2 part either, this pulley code won't render if
> > the shaft is >9.9mm.  Question already posted on that.
> >
And answered, needed to restart openscad.  Then I was able to generate 
the outer plastic's gcode. I left a 1mm hub at flange OD on the bottom 
so it should have a stout flange.  But I'm having adhesion troubles now, 
pulling the raft loose. But just found a birds nest on the nozzle, 
warmed it up and removed that and I think I'm ok for a build, maybe 2.  
Then scuff it up with some 600 grit, its wearing smooth. 

But ATM I am running a calibration test build. Couple hours I think.
 
Thanks Chris

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to