The CoC topic has been over a couple of messages ago for me, but you insist in stating you opinion out loud like it was the only one, I already apologised for this. I didn't find your CoC drama nice, and I think I will accurately avoid writing here for a long long time, I dislike conflicts of all kinds, I would have appreciated more if at least you had been looking for a constructive conversation instead of making a conflict out of it.
That said I am off to start building a big 3D printer, probably I will post pictures when its done. Regards On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 17:30 -0600, R C wrote: > On 6/29/21 5:17 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 17:07 -0600, R C wrote: > > > On 6/29/21 4:54 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote: > > > > Could you please try to avoid reading too literally and instead > > > > try > > > > to > > > > understand the broad sense of what I write? > > > I can try, but I am not good at reading minds, it's not my > > > problem > > > you > > > didn't say what you meant. > > > > I said exactly what I meant, but for some (unknow to me) reason you > > don't interpret it as I do: > That's because your comparison is/was wrong. > > I presume that good organization is > > necessary to avoid the chaos that can sometimes arise in human > > interactions. > > No it isn't, chaos arises because of people disagreeing, hence what > you > call good organization isn't necessarily interpreted as good by > others > and creates chaos. > > > > The fact that LinuxCNC succeeded without organization is > > pure luck in my opinion, in general human communities organize > > themselves to avoid being overwhelmed by chaos and to facilitate > > the > > resolution of internal conflicts. > > No I think they succeeded, because these "guys" doing this are very > good > at what they are doing, are knowledgeable, and like doing this for > others to enjoy this software (which I definitely do). > > > > Also, I am done with this conversation.. I go with the guy with > the > "be kind sign" email, I think that is what we should have as a CoC > (and > I didn't see inclusive etc etc in the definition of 'kind') > > > over and out. > > > > > > Also, I changed my mind ...... > > > > > > hey all, can we still have that CoC? with that one rule in it > > > that > > > said > > > something about not telling others what to do, or something like > > > that. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 16:39 -0600, R C wrote: > > > > > On 6/29/21 4:19 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 16:29 -0500, Bari wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/29/21 4:12 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, eccept for an evasive and dumb answer, there > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > still > > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > why... > > > > > > > > > let me guess, you don't really have one other then a > > > > > > > > > controlling > > > > > > > > > vague one. > > > > > > > > The why is evident, we don't live in a ruleless world, > > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > nature > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > animal groups have their survival rules. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a question of survival of the community as a > > > > > > > > cohesive > > > > > > > > group. > > > > > > > I thought that LCNC is an open source software project. > > > > > > > What > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > dramatic talk of animal survival? > > > > > > as humans we are evoluted animals and human collectivity > > > > > > follows > > > > > > the > > > > > > same survival rules. That is only for comparison. > > > > > those are not rules, those are laws deducted from what is > > > > > observed, > > > > > same/similar to physical laws (like the law of gravity). > > > > > > > > > > Animals don't have rules on how to behave, there might be > > > > > some > > > > > very > > > > > primal ones based on picking order, power. > > > > > > > > > > for example, a coyote doesn't give a damn that there is a > > > > > rule > > > > > not > > > > > to > > > > > attack poodles, the only reason for it not to attack the > > > > > poodle > > > > > is if > > > > > it > > > > > were more dangerous for the coyote then for the poodle. > > > > > > > > > > Evolution does have NOTHING to do with rules, it is a > > > > > pattern, "a > > > > > scientific law" that is assumed and proven because of > > > > > observations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, you cannot compare something, with something else that > > > > > is > > > > > false > > > > > or > > > > > doesn't make sense, that is nonsense, a moot point in any > > > > > argument. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Emc-users mailing list > > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-users mailing list > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
