Anno domini 2021 Wed, 30 Jun 05:01:18 -0400
 Mark scripsit:
> 
> On 6/29/21 4:57 PM, Les Newell wrote:
> > Valerio, I agree completely. I also think we should give Jeff a break 
> > here. LinuxCNC is a loosely organized group and things only really get 
> > done when someone sees a problem and tries to fix it. Many open source 
> > projects have a CoC so Jeff put something together, trying to help. He 
> > now pretty much gets accused of being a dictator.  I'm sure that is 
> > far from his intention.
> >
> >> The only point I can make is that we need a community revision and
> >> voting of the CoC.
> >
> > Historically when someone comes up with a new feature they announce it 
> > on the list, there is a bit of discussion about it and in most cases 
> > it gets added to the source, possibly with some modification. No name 
> > calling or political posturing. That is probably closer to how Jeff 
> > expected this to go.
> >
> > Les
> 
> 
> And that's the key point Les.  There was no prior discussion.  As was 
> pointed out in another post, this CoC was created and implemented with 
> no input from the group at large.
> 

That's how things with CoC always go: some self-proclaimed policemen force it 
on everybody else and are upset when they face resistance. Usual argument is 
"that's exactly why we need XYZ". Same game everywhere.

Nik

> Mark
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 



-- 
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with 
the NSA, CIA ...


_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to