On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 15:17 -0600, R C wrote: > On 6/29/21 3:07 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 15:45 -0500, Bari wrote: > > > On 6/29/21 3:21 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 13:42 -0600, R C wrote: > > > > > On 6/29/21 11:09 AM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote: > > > > > > The whole purpose of a CoC is telling people how to behave > > > > > > with > > > > > > respect > > > > > > to each other. Basically you are free to think as you will > > > > > > provided > > > > > > that you act as the CoC says. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > and that is why it is inappropriate, and useless, there is no > > > > > way > > > > > you > > > > > can predict how/what offends people (and nowadays. Creating > > > > > rules > > > > > for > > > > > what/how/when and to whom what can be said, well, there are > > > > > countries > > > > > where you can happily follow those rules. > > > > This is what I think: > > > > > > > > The point of a CoC is to tell people that the expected behavior > > > > is > > > > to > > > > act kindly with respect to each other, and the CoC must foresee > > > > and > > > > provide means to resolve any controvercies that may arise, and > > > > do > > > > this > > > > kindly as much as possible in order to reestablish the > > > > community > > > > aggregation and mutual respect. > > > > > > > > I don't understand why there is so much friction on adopting a > > > > CoC, > > > > the > > > > vast majority of open source projects around the world has a > > > > CoC > > > > which > > > > is created, reviewed and accepted by community members. > > > > > > > > The only point I can make is that we need a community revision > > > > and > > > > voting of the CoC. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > The problem is with what is perceived as acceptable and by whom. > > > Different people perceive things differently based on their > > > background, > > > experiences, education, parenting, intelligence, age, > > > environment, > > > country they live in, etc. etc. > > > > > > Another thing to consider is what is LinuxCNC? What is the board > > > of > > > directors? is this a democracy or a dictatorship or something > > > else? > > > > It is incredible that after so many years those questions are still > > open. They should have been resolved many years ago, when the > > community > > was born. > > > > > Who > > > decides which persons that this applies to? Users, persons in > > > IRC, > > > developers that wish to have their code included in the main > > > distribution, forum posters, etc who is this for and what is the > > > real > > > reason for this? > > > > > > It is a slippery slope. > > Usually the leadership is voted and elected by members, and the CoC > > should be applied to *everything* involving the community, so > > Users, > > persons in IRC, developers that wish to have their code included in > > the > > main distribution, forum posters, visitors, external experts, and > > this > > is not an exhaustive list. > > You made a spelling mistake, it is not spelled "leadership", it > typically is spelled "corrupt politicians" or "business major with > a > bloated ego" > > > If it was leadership, you'd go do something .. and the rest would > be > following behind you, which doesn't seem to be the case.
But I do not see any corrupted politician or business major with a bloated ego in the LinuxCNC community. Can I ask you to avoid writing to me privately please? _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
