On 6/29/21 2:57 PM, Les Newell wrote:
Valerio, I agree completely. I also think we should give Jeff a break
here. LinuxCNC is a loosely organized group and things only really get
done when someone sees a problem and tries to fix it. Many open source
projects have a CoC so Jeff put something together, trying to help. He
now pretty much gets accused of being a dictator. I'm sure that is
far from his intention.
The only point I can make is that we need a community revision and
voting of the CoC.
Historically when someone comes up with a new feature they announce it
on the list, there is a bit of discussion about it and in most cases
it gets added to the source, possibly with some modification. No name
calling or political posturing. That is probably closer to how Jeff
expected this to go.
Are you trying to organize this thing, take over and sell it or so?
Les
On 29/06/2021 21:21, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:
This is what I think:
The point of a CoC is to tell people that the expected behavior is to
act kindly with respect to each other, and the CoC must foresee and
provide means to resolve any controvercies that may arise, and do this
kindly as much as possible in order to reestablish the community
aggregation and mutual respect.
I don't understand why there is so much friction on adopting a CoC, the
vast majority of open source projects around the world has a CoC which
is created, reviewed and accepted by community members.
The only point I can make is that we need a community revision and
voting of the CoC.
Regards
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
