it's true, never talk to detractors, they bring you to their level and beat you for experience.
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 15:52 +0000, Scott Harwell via Emc-users wrote: > I hate to point this out, but this response appears to be a > violation of the CoC. > Scott(still working on the smiley face thing) > > On Wednesday, June 30, 2021, 10:42:15 AM CDT, Valerio Bellizzomi > <vale...@selnet.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 17:30 +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: > > Anno domini 2021 Wed, 30 Jun 17:21:08 +0200 > > Valerio Bellizzomi scripsit: > > > On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 16:14 +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: > > > > Anno domini 2021 Wed, 30 Jun 16:04:47 +0200 > > > > Valerio Bellizzomi scripsit: > > > > > On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 15:46 +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote: > > > > > > Anno domini 2021 Wed, 30 Jun 15:41:13 +0200 > > > > > > Valerio Bellizzomi scripsit: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 09:29 -0400, Mark Wendt wrote: > > > > > > > > We still have not heard any reason(s) as to the > > > > > > > > necessity > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > having a > > > > > > > > code > > > > > > > > of conduct for this list. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my organization I have established codes of conduct > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > seems > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > be a winning choice for everybody, no one here is > > > > > > > concerned > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > controlled or enforced, they know that codes are a > > > > > > > necessary > > > > > > > thing > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > an organization to be successful in the long term and > > > > > > > vis- > > > > > > > a-vis > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > bigger and broader organizations with which we might > > > > > > > interact. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you do not want to control or enforce it, then just drop > > > > > > it. > > > > > > CoC > > > > > > either has an agenda or it is better droped. > > > > > > > > > > It is my organization and I do what I want here. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > I wonder with what right you allow yourself to comment since > > > > > you do > > > > > not > > > > > and will never be part of my organization. > > > > > > > > Oh cool. Then can I assume the CoC nonsens of your organisation > > > > will > > > > not be forced on this organisation (or mailinglist or forum or > > > > whatever you might call it)? Because it is, then there's an > > > > agenda we > > > > should talk about in public. > > > > > > > > Nik > > > > > > 1) > > > https://www.selroc.systems/forum/general-information/questions-and-answers/72-official-code-of-ethics-and-professional-conduct > > > > > > 2) > > > https://www.selroc.systems/forum/general-information/questions-and-answers/246-the-quality-of-this-forum > > > > > > 3) > > > https://www.selroc.systems/forum/general-information/questions-and-answers/185-why-choose-selroc-systems > > > > So your forum has 139 postings in total, but several pages CoC. Of > > course the CoC did attract a lot of people to participate, didn't > > it? > > > > Nik > > You can't understand what you read, that defect is called functional > illiteracy. > > > On > https://www.selroc.systems/forum/general-information/questions-and-answers/246-the-quality-of-this-forum > : > > "This is sensed to be a small professional quality forum. The posts > written here should always follow the rules written here > https://www.selroc.systems/forum/gen...sional-conduct"; > > > i.e. This means I admit to the forum only people I know and trust. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
