On Tue 2015-09-15 12:38:32 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> There's some work underway to regularize the language used by OpenPGP
> applications.  As Gus said at Circumvention, "Untrusted Good Signature
> just sucks."

:)
 
> I'd much rather we waited to see if anything comes of this language
> regularization attempt before we changed the Enigmail language.  If we
> make a change, and then a few months later change it again to comply
> with the regularization, I think that would confuse a lot of people.

Alternately, we *know* that the existing language confuses a lot of
people, and enigmail has an opportunity to drive the language
regularization process by using a reasonable, clean vocabulary itself.

I don't think that any enigmail development should wait on results --
enigmail should help make the results happen.

regards,

         --dkg

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Reply via email to