> Alternately, we *know* that the existing language confuses a lot of > people, and enigmail has an opportunity to drive the language > regularization process by using a reasonable, clean vocabulary > itself.
It sounds a lot like the "something must be done; this is something; ergo we must do it" fallacy. Enigmail is used in a lot of places, and there's an entire community of trainers who teach it to others. Changing the terminology on them once is understandable, especially if it fixes problems. Changing it twice in quick succession seems rude to the trainers, who will have to adapt their teaching materials, FAQs, manuals, webpages, etc., twice. > I don't think that any enigmail development should wait on results > -- enigmail should help make the results happen. I emphatically disagree. _______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
