-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 19/09/2015 23:11, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> The more information that you add to the screens the less of it
>> the 'average user' will read. The famous "Click next - next -
>> ok" effect.
>
> Yes, I agree; this is why I'm suggesting reducing the presented
> information to whether a signature is present, and how much
> confidence Enigmail is placing in the signature. Everything
> beyond that would be hidden from the user -- easy to discover
> (click on the security notice), but not something the user had to
> pay attention to unless they specifically wished.
>
Another 2c from an average user -
In my opinion many (most?) people will only really need lsign - if
that means, as it does to me, "I know this person". The full signing
("I have fully verified this person and his signature via official
documents") by those who don't understand the implications of it is
where the problem lies. Personally, I'd make lsign the default.
Anyone who understands enough to know he has a real need for the full
signing can easily search menus to find the appropriate link. IOW,
both need to be present, but lsign needs to be easiest found.
Or am I being too simplistic?
BTW, I do like the simplicity of the Details button.
Anne
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlX+kTAACgkQj93fyh4cnBf1jACfWz9LdYpZ7xuXJsJPyW6CqWy0
zp4An2yjfgsm4OihOQcgCkxe+AZ1eANf
=MRJN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here:
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
