On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:15:28 +0100 Davide Andreoli <d...@gurumeditation.it>
said:

> 2018-01-31 10:52 GMT+01:00 Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com>:
> 
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:37:28 +1030 Simon Lees <sfl...@suse.de> said:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 31/01/18 10:39, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> > > > The fdo icons in the efl theme are indeed GPL3,
> > > > as clearly staten in COPYING.images and data/elementary/themes/fdo
> > > >
> > > > I have no idea about the contamination and the resulting theme final
> > > > license.
> > > >
> > > > For sure I want (and we must) them to remain to that license.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't understand why you wouldn't want them licensed under an
> > > equivalent creative commons license rather then GPL-3, GPL-3 is designed
> > > for source code where as creative commons is designed for images, using
> > > the wrong sort of licenses leads to the ambiguities we are seeing here,
> > > if we can't convince the upstream developers to change there isn't much
> > > we can do but its worth trying.
> >
> > we need to probably replace them with icons that are not licensed like the
> > above.
> >
> > as for contamination, that is generally considered to be true with code if
> > they
> > share the same memory space. icons on the other hand do not. they are first
> > decoded/rendered then manipulated. code from the binary is mapped directly
> > into
> > memory as-is pretty much minus relocation.
> >
> > so while i don't think DATA files would leak their license to efl, gplv3
> > does
> > create requirements of its host system (to allow any gplv3 components to be
> > replaceable by the end user) and that requires any system that would ship
> > these
> > to not be locked down. that is generally disliked by commercial vendors.
> >
> 
> Well, I expect a commercial vendor with a locked down device to at least
> provide a
> theme of their own :)


the problem is they just read "gplv3" and run away without looking at the
details most likely... :) so just having it off the list is a good thing.

> > so my take is "replace them". i could replace them anyway if the theme
> > fundamentally changed (e.g. became flat).
> >
> > > >
> > > > 2018-01-30 14:05 GMT+01:00 Jean-Philippe André <j...@videolan.org>:
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 9:30 PM, Simon Lees <sfl...@suse.de> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 30/01/18 22:20, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> > > >>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Sungtaek pointed out to me that we have GPLv3-licensed artworks
> > (unsual
> > > >>> for
> > > >>>> images) in our theme, under data/elementary/theme/fdo. Those images
> > are
> > > >>> are
> > > >>>> then included in the compiled theme default.edj. One source is
> > clearly
> > > >>>> GPLv3:
> > > >>>> https://tiheum.deviantart.com/art/Faenza-Icons-173323228
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Now I wonder what the implications of this are...
> > > >>>> 1. Does Elementary become GPL because we load the theme and it
> > contains
> > > >>>> executable code (embryo & edje programs), so the theme is to be
> > > >>> considered
> > > >>>> a library, contaminating everything??
> > > >>>> 2. Or only the theme itself is GPL, by contamination from those
> > images?
> > > >>>> 3. Or is the compiled theme file not GPL because we're not linking
> > or
> > > >>>> derivating, merely archiving those images like in a Zip file, in
> > which
> > > >>> case
> > > >>>> only what's in the tree is GPL? This would be same as HTML:
> > > >>>> https://news.slashdot.org/story/13/06/26/2113242/when-
> > > >>> gpl-becomes-almost-gpl-the-css-images-and-javascript-
> > > >>> loophole/informative-comments#comments
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> In the FAQ I only found a mention about fonts:
> > > >>>> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#FontException
> > > >>>> We don't have such an exception.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Pretty sure there is no problem (i.e. #3 is right), but IANAL so I'd
> > > >>> rather
> > > >>>> ask away :)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Licence wise i've always considered themes to be separate, whether
> > that
> > > >>> is correct or not is another question. GPL with images is silly
> > anyway
> > > >>> and we really should be asking upstream to relicense with some form
> > of
> > > >>> creative commons anyway which makes far more sense, but I guess the
> > > >>> theme is probably technically GPL-3 as a binary.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Not so sure. HTML seems to be a crazy exception: An HTML file
> > containing
> > > >> GPL licensed JS code is not GPL itself. Not consistent but makes
> > sense. EDJ
> > > >> probably also falls under the category of "container".
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>> Probably the biggest actual real life issue is if the theme is being
> > > >>> used in consumer devices such as tizen you would need to provide
> > > >>> consumers a way to swap there stock theme for one of there choice.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Yeah that's partly why I'm asking. :)
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Jean-Philippe André
> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> ------------------
> > > >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > >>
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------------------
> > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > > > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Simon Lees (Simotek)                            http://simotek.net
> > >
> > > Emergency Update Team                           keybase.io/simotek
> > > SUSE Linux                           Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
> > > GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
> > Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------------------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > _______________________________________________
> > enlightenment-devel mailing list
> > enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel


-- 
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to