On 3/1/07, Christopher Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just my 2 cents, but with gains like that how can we NOT use a hash :)
Right, we're going to use a hash one way or another, just a question of if we want to break the edje format to do it. :) > Such is the way with pre-alpha code...things break. Theme/edj authors > will just have to deal with it I suppose. I'm sure at some point there > will be another breakage after this one before things start to settle. Probably will be another break down the line, but at some point there will have to be a version freeze on the format. Just trying to be certain that's not now. > I say if it's more efficient, go for it...tho imho we should wait until > "old man" has a chance to chime in :) Sure, though he has been very busy lately and if there is a consensus on the current format state, I don't think we need to bother him with it. Thanks for the feedback. Nathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
