On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:13:19AM -0600, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > On 3/1/07, Christopher Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just my 2 cents, but with gains like that how can we NOT use a hash :) > > Right, we're going to use a hash one way or another, just a question > of if we want to break the edje format to do it. :)
In this case, old files will just need to be recompiled (edje_recc should do it), so I don't see a problem. At some point we'll need to start versioning the file format and keeping the code compatible with old versions, but that can probably wait until release. (e.g. stay compatible with release versions, but not the various iterations in between). rephorm ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
