On 3/2/07, Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IIRC there's one global "data" section, and every collection/group does > have its own "data" section, too. So we can't get away with a single > hash table. Not that it matters much :)
Right, the proposed change was only for the global data section and not the group data sections. My thinking was that with per-group data collections, you are much less likely to have many items in the list since they are a much smaller scope for each. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
