On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 10:07 +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:02:38 -0300 "Caio Marcelo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > > to play with it first... the question is.. embryo - keep for compatibility
> > > (after the lua change) or throw out? i would keep it anyway while adding
> > > lua... but then.. remove or not? i am listening to those using embryo
> > > right
> > > now.
> >
> > Well, until Lua is in place I see no problem in keeping Embryo code
> > also working if causes no harm, using some mechanism like the proposed
> > in other thread: having annotations for the script tag, and defaults
> > it to embryo. After Lua is ok, we can evaluate how much Embryo is
> > still needed, having the option of phasing out it slowly.. (changing
> > the default script {} to go Lua first, and then removing the
> > annotations).
>
> oh absolutely - the question more is.. to release edje 1.0 - do we remove
> embryo after lua is up and fully functional (equivalent to embryo or better)
>
>
better yet, is embryo going to be maintained after that? If it's not,
then it should be removed, since sooner or later, it will fall behind
lua. so is anyone willing to maintain embryo?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
