Dans son message intitulé « Re: [E-devel] enlightenment-svn Digest, Vol 5, Issue 78 » du Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:33:47 -0600, Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> nous a donné l'occasion de lire :
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:19:41 +0100 > Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dans son message intitulé « Re: [E-devel] enlightenment-svn Digest, > > Vol 5, Issue 78 » du Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:32:28 -0600, Nick Hughart > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> nous a donné l'occasion de lire : > > > > > Another idea might be collapsible headers for each category. > > > Clicking on the header would then expand that category in the > > > list. In fact a generic collapsible widget could be useful in > > > other places as well. > > > > FWIW, I almost have that for ilist. I have a little resizing issue > > when collapsing, apart from that it should be ok for general > > comsumption soon. > > Is this a generic widget that I can put any widgets in or just for the > ilist headers? No, it's just for ilist headers (basically, it hides all elements between folded header to the next one). Chidambar > > > Another idea would be to have a list of categories. Once you > > > pick a category, the contents of the list are replaced with that > > > category with a button to go backwards. This type of interface > > > works on a touchscreen as well as a desktop. Some examples of > > > this type of interface is the iPhone Settings and to a lesser > > > extent the Windows Control Panel (the new one with the categories > > > and such, not the classic one). Both provide a similar flow of > > > category -> items and include some way to go back. So in this > > > way I see it as serving both worlds and also has some track > > > record of actually being useful for both. > > > > I was wondering if it wouldn't be better to always use the same > > window instead of opening a new window everytime, e.g., you selected > > category, then item, and all the content of the window is being > > replaced by the settings themselves instead of opening a new one. > > Problem is that I think that it is against E philosophy... > > I think this would be a neat idea myself, not sure about others.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
