On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Michael Jennings <m...@kainx.org> wrote:
> On Thursday, 01 April 2010, at 21:29:50 (-0400),
> Jose Gonzalez wrote:
>
>>    As you say.. But it's not about who to remove if you want to or
>> not, (and of course they won't care), it's about saying clearly that
>> it's you not some ambiguous "we".
>
> You can count me in that "we" as well.  I fully support what he's
> proposing, as do the other developers who were present when the topic
> came up.

I think you can count many of the current active
developers/contributor in the "we". I think it's just a good policy to
sometime cleanup account of people that don't contribute anymore to
the project. Of course, they will get back their account if they just
ask. It will give us a more accurate picture of e devs.
-- 
Cedric BAIL

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to