On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Cedric BAIL <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Michael Jennings <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thursday, 01 April 2010, at 21:29:50 (-0400), >> Jose Gonzalez wrote: >> >>> As you say.. But it's not about who to remove if you want to or >>> not, (and of course they won't care), it's about saying clearly that >>> it's you not some ambiguous "we". >> >> You can count me in that "we" as well. I fully support what he's >> proposing, as do the other developers who were present when the topic >> came up. > > I think you can count many of the current active > developers/contributor in the "we". I think it's just a good policy to > sometime cleanup account of people that don't contribute anymore to > the project. Of course, they will get back their account if they just > ask. It will give us a more accurate picture of e devs.
Yes, and let's stop feeding the trollss...... back to code :-D -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [email protected] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
