On 11/01/18 00:06, Stephen Houston wrote:
If you aren't using connman,
I'm not, mainly because NM is working perfectly, and I'm not aware of the reasons why I might want to change. Is connman better or faster?
I know it was unusable when I first started using E many years ago, because it didn't support 802.1x and WPA2, but I assume it does so now. I know that when I tried, it wiped out NM and corrupted things so that I couldn't reinstall NM and get rid of Connman — I had to reinstall the OS. You will understand my reluctance to go through that again.
you'll want to use the wireless gadget it enlightenment/gadgets/wireless.git as it supports network manager as well as connman.
That sounds very useful. Where do I get this? ///Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
