> On 4/6/01 11:53, Chris Stearns at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Maybe a Read Me note is all that is needed to clear this up... "Diane L. Schirf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apparently, it was in the ReadMe. Which, typically, no one read. ;) (red-faced) "Maybe I... skimmed...over...that...part" Yeah, that's right. -- CMS -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Harry (lists)
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Dan Crevier
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Allen Watson
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Chris Stearns
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Harry (lists)
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Chris Stearns
- RE: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Gil Gordon
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Clayton Bennett
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Paul Berkowitz
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Clayton Bennett
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Chris Stearns
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Christian M. M. Brady
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Diane Ross
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Stewart Macdonald
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Christian M. M. Brady
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved Tim Mountford
