Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved

[Harry (lists)]

on 4/5/01 1:34 AM, Tim Mountford at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Okay, but as I saw it the SR updater simply moved the old defunct copy to
> the trash and replaced it with a new one, no? Ergo the modified app is no
> longer an issue. 

That's pretty much been my impression as well - the prior argumen would make
sense if the updater were to engage in some full-scale patching of the
original app, but best as I can tell, that is not the case.

Granted, the updater worked fine for me as well, but some interesting
questions are being raised here.

Harry


-- 
To unsubscribe:               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives: 
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>