On 7/15/02 5:19 PM, "Eric Hildum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As made plain by this thread, this mailing list does NOT represent a higher > user level than you'd find normally. And you base this on? Just because there is a point of view that is different than your own? Personally, the preference doesn't bother me one way or the other. That's not the point. What bothers me is that the software should "first do no harm" to borrow a phrase and not allow any intrusion based on the assumption that someone has read the preferences, the manual and their email. > invitations to support users who do not read their mail and do not read the > instructions would be most unwelcome. See above. A user shouldn't be punished for not studying the manual. And I can't stand that Entourage makes any assumptions about how I do my business. Some people have email filed into folders to get it off their server but they don't read it for days or longer. There should be no consequences to that work style by default. -- Judi Sohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.momathome.com -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
