On 15/7/02 9:58 pm, "Judi Sohn" wrote: >> That gives you a lot of control, >> especially when you consider that most people will want to use this and you >> don't have to if you don't want to. > > How do you know that "most people" will want to use this? I would think in > this day and age, "most people" would not want another user to be able to do > anything at all to their email program, even if it's a simple as adding > something to the calendar. "Most people" freak when software resets their > home page without asking permission first, they certainly don't want > calendar events added by others by default.
'Most people' don't freak when an email you send is added to their mail database - how else could you read it? When the calendar invitation arrives YOU have the choice whether or not to accept or decline it. If YOU want to, you can have entourage add the event to the calendar tentatively before you respond to the email OR you can set it up so this doesn't happen. What is wrong with this folks? It is all in the control of the user - that's YOU. I really can't get my head round all the complaints. What is it people are objecting to? -- Barry Wainwright <http://www.barryw.net> "Expenditure rises to meet income." -- C. Northcote Parkinson (The Law and the Profits, 1960, Chapter 1) -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
