On or near 9/3/03 12:36 PM, Brent at [EMAIL PROTECTED] observed: > On 9/1/03 7:51, "Remo Del Bello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 8/31/2003 6:57 PM, Mickey Stevens deftly typed out: >> >>> Actually, there's a bug with using the "IF Specific Header Received" >>> criterion in Entourage, in that it doesn't work properly, probably because >>> there are usually multiple "Received" headers in an e-mail. The only way to >>> make the rule work in this case is to use the "IF Any Header" criterion. >> >> Doh! I stand corrected. So does it match the first Received header or the >> last, I wonder? > > Well, it did not work, either way. I entered two rules following Mickey's > instructions. Basically, if in address book, ignore & if any header contains > 4.19.77. Then move to junk. > > The next piece of spam included the line: > Received: from localhost ([4.19.77.230]) > In the source info. > > It landed in the Inbox, not Junk. > > Is there something else that I can try? > > Brent
Mickey's rules work. Apparently, your message got processed by some rule earlier than those two. Try, as an experiment, putting them at the top of your rules list, and then select the spam message and "apple all rules", and see if it does not move to junk. If it does, you have to determine what rule is firing before it reaches those two rules in their normal place, and fix it. -- Microsoft MVP for Entourage/OE/Word (MVPs are volunteers) Allen Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Entourage FAQ site: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/> AppleScripts for Outlook Express and Entourage: <http://members.thinkaccess.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Scripts/> Entourage Help Pages: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
