On 12/6/03 10:16 PM, "Gary Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The script that I use is not a 'delete' script, it removes the HTML. I see
> text-only in the window, in my default message typeface.

I missed that. Sorry. See my previous message in this thread for more
discussion.

>> I'd find it both puritanical and overly controlling to tell other
>> people how they should express themselves in print, and foolish to refuse to
>> read their messages just for that reason.
> 
> You misread me.  Remove HTML does not delete the message.

Right.
> 
> As for the epithets...well, I wouldn't say that describes me at all. My
> character is quite the opposite on the charges of 'puritanical' and
> 'controlling'.

Wanting "plain" rather than "fancy" is a mark of the puritan, at least when
taken to all-or-nothing lengths. Not letting people's own self-expressions
reach you in the form in which they sent them is to some degree
"controlling", although it's not especially harmful if you don't try to get
them to change. Some of them might not even realize that your plain text
replies contain an unstated reprimand, if it's not stated. (I reply in the
format of the sender, which is Entourage's humanistic default.) At the
moment of writing I incorrectly thought you weren't reading the messages at
all, which did seem to be a form of passive-aggressive control. But I was
wrong about that.
> 
> The debate is on regarding 'foolish'.

Nah.

-- 
Paul Berkowitz
MVP Entourage
Entourage FAQ Page: http://www.entourage.mvps.org/toc.html

PLEASE always state which version of Entourage you are using - 2001 or X.
It's often impossible to answer your questions otherwise.


-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to