On 1/8/04 9:07 PM, "Charlie Fritzius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 1/8/04 8:55 PM, jud spencer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> Hmm., I use a UW-IMAP implementation as well and don't have any problems of >> the sort. I will say that the UW implementation is perhaps the worst that I >> have seen. > > While I do understand this statement and tend to agree, I find if very odd > that UW-IMAP's implementation of IMAP is so bad. After all, THEY INVENTED > IMAP! Why can't they get IMAP right!?!? It just boggles the mind... > They invented _their version_ of IMAP. I presume they're suffering from a "Not Invented Here" syndrome and are above incorporating improvements since made by others... Almost any time I hear of serious IMAP problems it turns out to be a UW server. -- Paul Berkowitz MVP Entourage Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/toc.html> AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/> PLEASE always state which version of Entourage you are using - 2001 or X. It's often impossible to answer your questions otherwise. -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
