Neil- Steve's response should be interesting... -Don > Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:38:28 -0700 > Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change and > other factors > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > > Steve, > > 31k is impressive. However, it be more impressed if we knew what > their specialties were in and where they conduct their studies. For > example, I see many DVMs & MDs on this list. I've seen other claims/ > lists like this full of people with little experience in climate > science. > > So, if this is valid for you, would you like to have Dr. Jim Hansen > perform your heart or brain surgery [heaven forbid that you need it]? > > neil > > > > On Jun 7, 6:07 pm, "Steven Springer" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Mike, Ed, All: > > > > Here is a link to ~31,000 American Scientists > > (http://www.oism.org/pproject/pproject.htm) who would disagree with the > > statement "that any legitimate debate on the subject of global warming is > > over"; there is also the infamous list of 600 World Scientists (UN > > affiliation) that also disagree with the Global Warming theory. > > > > Sorry, as has been noted in previous posts, the Global Warming theory is > > not unanimous among "creditable" scientists, nor is the proof submitted for > > support able to substantiate the conclusion of this theory. > > > > Steve Springer > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: [email protected] on behalf of Edward Frank > > Sent: Sun 6/7/2009 4:37 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change and > > other factors > > > > Mike, > > > > I believe that any legitimate debate on the subject of global warming is > > over, but you can disagree. I also agree with you and feel that many of > > the "solutions" being pushed in Washington are more for political show than > > anything. Some may even make things worse. We should be striving for > > better emission standards, more efficient burning, and whatever else can > > reasonably be done to lower our environmental footprint, but sending money > > to third world countries in order to pollute more is a useless transfer of > > wealth that does not accomplish anything but hurting our own economy. > > > > Ed > >
_________________________________________________________________ Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®. http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
