Neil, Thanks for your concern for my future health :). No, I would probably want someone to perform such an operation that is considered best in the field. How do you feel about Al Gore representing and fighting for the Global Warming theory? He is quite the climate scientist, is he not?
Steve Springer -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of neil Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 6:38 PM To: ENTSTrees Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change and other factors Steve, 31k is impressive. However, it be more impressed if we knew what their specialties were in and where they conduct their studies. For example, I see many DVMs & MDs on this list. I've seen other claims/ lists like this full of people with little experience in climate science. So, if this is valid for you, would you like to have Dr. Jim Hansen perform your heart or brain surgery [heaven forbid that you need it]? neil On Jun 7, 6:07 pm, "Steven Springer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike, Ed, All: > > Here is a link to ~31,000 American Scientists > (http://www.oism.org/pproject/pproject.htm) who would disagree with the > statement "that any legitimate debate on the subject of global warming is > over"; there is also the infamous list of 600 World Scientists (UN > affiliation) that also disagree with the Global Warming theory. > > Sorry, as has been noted in previous posts, the Global Warming theory is not > unanimous among "creditable" scientists, nor is the proof submitted for > support able to substantiate the conclusion of this theory. > > Steve Springer > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] on behalf of Edward Frank > Sent: Sun 6/7/2009 4:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change and > other factors > > Mike, > > I believe that any legitimate debate on the subject of global warming is > over, but you can disagree. I also agree with you and feel that many of the > "solutions" being pushed in Washington are more for political show than > anything. Some may even make things worse. We should be striving for better > emission standards, more efficient burning, and whatever else can reasonably > be done to lower our environmental footprint, but sending money to third > world countries in order to pollute more is a useless transfer of wealth that > does not accomplish anything but hurting our own economy. > > Ed --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
