What we have here, unfortunately, is these two (yet again) shouting into the dark just to hear their own voices. Honestly, we have no evidence this is anything more than antagonism for the sake of antagonism...
If you ask them for analysis, new data, specific refutation of model parameters, or even for a demonstration of real understanding of where the science is on the issue...you get silence, or changing gears to a new, even more vigorous, rant. Tilting at windmills. Calling this RGGI bull**** is just name calling. No attempt to provide salient criticism. No attempt to describe how the carbon cycle might be impacted by this proposal...where it might succeed, where it might fail. No engagement with the actual facts. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
