Actually, I can usually tell from the subject lines. Often the give-away is
some math term plus modeling or similar terminology. Volume and cubic areas
are also terms that I recognize. Those are the ones I feel safe deleting
without a second glance.
--
Carolyn Summers
63 Ferndale Drive
Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706
914-478-5712
From: DON BERTOLETTE <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:45:37 +0000
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change and
other factors
Carolyn,
Is it the formulas that give away the higher math ones?
-Don
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:33:05 -0400
Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change and
other factors
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Re: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change and other
factors Thank you, Ryan.
BTW, I love Barry¹s pictures and I think that many are not only gorgeous,
but useful, but I¹m afraid folks would get annoyed if I kept writing Great
pix! every time Barry posted.
And I don¹t see the need for separate lists. I¹ve stopped reading the
higher math ones, but it¹s easy to see which ones they are and I know how to
use the delete button. I love to read the results of your measuring work,
but I don¹t need to see how you got there (mathematically, that is), but if
others are interested, that¹s fine, too. Of course, I love the climbing
shots.
And I think I just broke all the rules about posting titles.
Sorry about that. Keep the good stuff (and the heavy) stuff coming. We can
deal with it.
--
Carolyn Summers
63 Ferndale Drive
Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706
914-478-5712
From: Ryan McEwan <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:15:50 -0400
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change and
other factors
What we have here, unfortunately, is these two (yet again) shouting into the
dark just to hear their own voices. Honestly, we have no evidence this is
anything more than antagonism for the sake of antagonism...
If you ask them for analysis, new data, specific refutation of model
parameters, or even for a demonstration of real understanding of where the
science is on the issue...you get silence, or changing gears to a new, even
more vigorous, rant.
Tilting at windmills.
Calling this RGGI bull**** is just name calling. No attempt to provide
salient criticism. No attempt to describe how the carbon cycle might be
impacted by this proposal...where it might succeed, where it might fail. No
engagement with the actual facts.
Windows Live : Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
<http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
