Steve, Marc, ENTS,

I carried out a quick survey on Cedrus to some appreciated new
references.

FOUR SPECIES CONCEPT (Atlas Cedar is C. atlantica) IS FAVOURED BY:

The Gymnosperm Database:
http://www.conifers.org/pi/ce/index.htm

NCBI Taxonomy Browser:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?mode=Tree&id=3321&lvl=3&p=mapview&p=has_linkout&p=blast_url&p=genome_blast&lin=f&keep=1&srchmode=1&unlock

Farjon (2008): A Natural History of Conifers.

THREE SPECIES CONCEPT (Atlas Cedar is C. atlantica) IS FAVOURED BY:

GRIN Taxonomy for Plants
http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/splist.pl?2217

TWO SPECIES CONCEPT (Atlas Cedar is C. libani subsb. atlantica) IS
FAVOURED BY:

Eckenwalder (2009): Conifers of the World: The Complete Reference.


Again, I take no stand. Just showing there is many opinions as Steve
noted.

- Kouta

On 21 marras, 04:18, Steve Galehouse <[email protected]> wrote:

> Kouta, Marc, ENTS-
>
> The problem with taxonomy is often it doesn't make sense--the genera Malus,
> Pyrus, and Aronia can interbreed, as can Kalmia and Rhododendron, but the
> series within the oaks, Erythrobalanus and Lepidobalanus, cannot, nor can
> different series of maples--it doesn't make sense to have species within a
> genus more biologically separated than those between two genera. Time for
> cladistics, I guess.
>
> Steve
>
> 2009/11/20 Kouta Räsänen <[email protected]>
>
> > Marc & Steve,
>
> > GRIN considers they still separate species:
>
> >http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?9690
>
> > (I am not claiming it's better to place them species than variety.)
>
> > - Kouta
>
> > On 20 marras, 22:41, Steve Galehouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > ENTS_
>
> > > There has always been a lot of speculation, and contention, within the
> > field
> > > of taxonomy. It was once thought Cyprus cedar, *Cedrus brevifolia*,  was
> > a
> > > separate species, but that is now included as a variety or race of *C.
> > > libani* as well---some authors even include Deodar as a variety of *C.
> > > libani*. Closer to home, some authors consider Fraser fir a sub. of
> > balsam
> > > fir, pond cypress a sub of bald cypress, and Canada yew a sub. of English
> > > yew.
>
> > > Steve
>
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Marcboston <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > Not to complicate things but it is my understanding that Cedrus
> > > > atlantica has been lumped into the species libani.  The "atlantica"
> > > > form is now classified as a variety/sub-species of Cedrus libani at
> > > > least in the nursery trade.
>
> > > > On Nov 20, 9:45 am, Kouta Räsänen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Jenny, Steve et al.,
>
> > > > > I guess Steve has right: rather Cedar of Lebanon than Atlas Cedar
> > > > > because of flat-topped crown.
>
> > > > > There are a lot of similarities between European and your vegetation.
> > > > > Considering trees, there are even shared native species, like
> > > > > Juniperus communis and Alnus incana. Many species pairs are very
> > > > > similar, like Betula pendula - B. papyrifera, Ulmus laevis - U.
> > > > > americana, Populus tremula - P. tremuloides, Populus nigra - P.
> > > > > deltoides etc.
>
> > > > > > for some reason they are often the ones that are out of favor back
> > in
> > > > North
> > > > > > Ameica: silver maple, box-elder, and black locust as examples.
>
> > > > > That's true. I think one reason is that there are not similar species
> > > > > in European nature: no maples with silvery leaf underside, no maples
> > > > > with compoud leaves and no large fabaceous trees. The gardeners like
> > > > > trees they don't see everywhere in the bush. In addition, the locust
> > > > > borer is absent in Europe, and consequently Black Locust is very
> > vital
> > > > > here - even too vital: in southern Europe it has become one of the
> > > > > most common tree species.
>
> > > > > - Kouta
>
> > > > --
> > > > Eastern Native Tree Societyhttp://www.nativetreesociety.org
> > > > Send email to [email protected]
> > > > Visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> > > > To unsubscribe send email to 
> > > > [email protected]<entstrees%[email protected]>
> > <entstrees%[email protected]<entstrees%[email protected]>
>
> > --
> > Eastern Native Tree Societyhttp://www.nativetreesociety.org
> > Send email to [email protected]
> > Visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> > To unsubscribe send email to 
> > [email protected]<entstrees%[email protected]>

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

Reply via email to