Maybe Shakespere(sp?) had it wrong, it wasn't kill all the lawyers it was 
suppose to be kill all the politians
Beth

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:54, Lee Frelich <[email protected]> wrote:

Paul:

Once again, good points. We have swung back and forth between so-called 
liberal and conservative leaders, and in the mean time we got emerald 
ash borer, dutch elm disease, hemlock wooley adelgid, balsam fir wooly 
adelgid (which is now in Maine), butternut canker, beech bark disease, 
Asian long-horned beetle, sudden oak death, sirex wood wasp, and forest 
decline caused by earthworms, deer and climate change.

Lee

Paul Jost wrote:
Lee,

Yes, arguing about politics leads to distraction from the real 
issues.  The national press caters to their audience for higher 
ratings and to get their viewers emotionally involved.  There is often 
little real content once the discussions begin to evolve, but are 
effective in increasing the polarization of our country based upon a 
subset of the issues that we all have to deal with.  In a family of 9, 
roughly half of my family swings to the left and half to the right, 
all to varying degrees.  Only my dad is addicted to the national 
TV/Radio shows, probably because he has more free time to do so than 
any of us.  Thankfully, the shows have not been successful in reeling 
me in.

Among my disappointments with our country is the extent to which 
forest issues get lost in modern politics.  As people lose their ties 
to the land, clean air and water seem to be the only important 
environmental issues.  There seems to be no national party that 
adequately supports wildlife and wild lands issues.

Paul

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Lee Frelich <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

   Paul:

   Good points--you must be a true Midwesterner. Must have been those
   "shock shows" as you termed them on Fox that I was watching that
   accidentally started this whole discussion. As I said, they weren't
   liberal or conservative, just irrational. Good thing I only watch
   daytime TV once a year while having my car repaired.

   I do have a lot of fun watching other people accusing each other of
   being liberal or conservative. Unfortunately, however, that activity
   takes up almost all of the political scene and as a result, we
   don't pay
   any serious attention to problems that need to be solved.

   Lee

   Paul Jost wrote:
Come on, open your mind.  CNN and MSNBC are horrible reporters, as
horribly liberal slanted as Fox is horribly conservative slanted.
Excluding the shock shows, Fox tends to more accurately report both
sides while still slanting conservative while the others put in only
token efforts to report the conservative viewpoints.  None of the
national press sources are even close to being balanced.  Both state
many truths mixed with omissions and distortions.  If you believe
otherwise, than you only accept lies that support your view point,
which is not necessarily a good thing, but maybe to you it is.

The truth is that the press on both sides has an agenda and slants
their reporting accordingly.  Both parties have good points and bad
points on their platforms.  Neither is the right choice.
Unfortunately, the other choices aren't realistic winners any time
soon.  This is why many midwesterners tend to be middle of the
roaders, handpicking moderate candidates that lean their way.  For
some reason, the more urban coast dwellers feel the need to be more
polarized and are condescending to eachother regarding their
viewpoints, both arrogantly asserting their correctness over the
   other.

Admit it.  There is not perfect party, and at different levels,
   local,
state, national, the right choice is not always from the same party.
...and with the level of corruption that increases at the higher
levels, I'd argue that most of the time, there is no right
   choice.  We
have all heard many examples of anti-environmental policy by
conservatives, but the liberals are guilty of similar practices at
times, too.  Here is one example that comes to mind, out of many.
Hopefully, all my recollections are accurate.

Many liberals champion Clinton's environmental policy, while many at
regional and state levels that were affected by his poorer
environmental policies, chastised him.  There was a western old
   growth
preservationist group called something like Environmentalists
   Against
Clinton, or something like that.  There were others like the
   Siskiyou
Regional Education Project.  Easterners never heard about them.  The
liberal national press didn't give them or their issues any
   coverage.
They were angered by Clinton's signing of legislation with the
   Salvage
Rider which re-enabled logging of forests that had only months
   earlier
been protected, or assumed to be protected by the nationally
publicized spotted owl protection effort.  Once things quieted down,
he reopened logging under another name.  The roadless area
   protection
that Clinton is credited with was passes as an executive order
   during
his last days as president so that he wouldn't have to deal with
   it's
negative political impacts against rich lobbyists until after the
election. At least through the end of Bush's first term, more old
growth forest was logged during the Clinton years. With what was
reported at the time, you would think that in Bush's first term, he
would have surpassed the Clinton era's logging of old growth forests
in the west.   A quick internet search came up with this text from
that time:
   http://www.fireecology.org/research/post_rider_salvage.htm

There is NO right party.  Both of them really stink!!!  Stop the
superiority complex attitudes and open your minds a little.. Geez!
Given the lessons of the past, and all the rhetoric coming from the
current administration, I won't believe that Obama is any better
   until
he accomplishes something significant without continuing to ruin our
economy.  (Yes, continuing down the path of economic
   self-distruction
of ALL the recent past presidents during my lifetime.)

Paul J.



On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Ariel <[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

   "I could say the same about CNN and the other networks"

   No, you couldn't.  Only Faux News blatantly makes things up.
    The
   rest simply confuse 'balance' for objectivity.


   /Lin/
   /

   /


   --- On *Tue, 12/22/09, Will Fell /<[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
   <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>/*
   wrote:


       From: Will Fell <[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>>>
       Subject: [ENTS] Re: A little story
       To: "ENTSTrees" <[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
       <mailto:[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>>>
       Date: Tuesday, December 22, 2009, 9:49 AM

       I too am a conservative and an environmentalist. I could say
       the same
       about CNN and the other networks which are nothing more
   than the
       publicity arm of the current administration. Ed makes a
   good point
       about the NRA and if you look at the current enviromental
       groups THAT
       REALLY do make a difference, they hew somewhat to the
   same narrow
       focus.

       On Dec 21, 10:12 pm, Barry Caselli
   <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>>
       wrote:
You say "Fox Network". Are you referring to the local Fox
       affiliate, or The Fox News Channel? The Fox News Channel is
       one of my all-time favorite channels.

--- On Mon, 12/21/09, Lee Frelich <[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>>
       wrote:

From: Lee Frelich <[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [ENTS] A little story
To: [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>
Date: Monday, December 21, 2009, 5:55 PM

Bob:

Similar thing happened to me at the Buick dealer in
       Minneapolis two
weeks ago, except the TV was set on Fox network.  I had no
       idea that TV
was such irrational nonsense. If I though it would do any
       good, I would
write in and tell the FCC that Fox should not be
   relicensed
       to broadcast
when their current license expires.

Lee





[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>
       wrote:
ENTS,

Back when I was younger, before my hair turned gray and
       starting
falling out, I imagined how I might recognize the
   onset of
       decline
into old age with its attendant feelings of
   powerlessness
       and the
eventual oblivion?

This morning I think I discovered the metric needed,
   while
       waiting for
my car to be serviced at the local Buick dealer. It
   was a
       little too
raw to go outside and wander around looking at
   trees, so I
       stuck it
out in the waiting room, which meant I was exposed
   to the
       T.V. set.
Game shows. Horror of horrors. Two little old ladies had
       copped the
set were glued to the wins and losses. They discouraged
       any thoughts
of channel changing with piercing looks. I audibly
   mumbled my
displeasure, but wasn't about to chance getting
   swatted by
       an old
lady's purse.. I sullenly set through the hoopla.

Game shows. What better measure of mental decline than a
       tally of the
number of hours spent watching giddy contestants
       alternately scream
and bawl and confirm our addiction to materialism. Where
       do we cast
our ballots for euthanasia?

Bob

--
Eastern Native Tree
       Societyhttp://www.nativetreesociety.org
   <http://www.nativetreesociety.org>
       <http://www.nativetreesociety.org/>
Send email to [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>
Visit this group
       athttp://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
   <http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en>
To unsubscribe send email to
       [email protected]
   <mailto:entstrees%[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>

--
Eastern Native Tree
   Societyhttp://www.nativetreesociety.org
   <http://www.nativetreesociety.org>
       <http://www.nativetreesociety.org/>
Send email to [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>
Visit this group
       athttp://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
   <http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en>
To unsubscribe send email to
       [email protected]
   <mailto:entstrees%[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>-
       Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

       --
       Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
       <http://www.nativetreesociety.org/>
       Send email to [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>

       Visit this group at
       http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
       To unsubscribe send email to
       [email protected]
   <mailto:entstrees%[email protected]>

   <http://us.mc562.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]>

   --
   Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
   Send email to [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
   <mailto:[email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>>
   Visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
   To unsubscribe send email to
   [email protected]
   <mailto:entstrees%[email protected]>
   <mailto:entstrees%[email protected]
   <mailto:entstrees%[email protected]>>


--
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to
   [email protected]
   <mailto:entstrees%[email protected]>

   --
   Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
   Send email to [email protected]
   <mailto:[email protected]>
   Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
   To unsubscribe send email to
   [email protected]
   <mailto:entstrees%[email protected]>


-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org 
Send email to [email protected] 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en 
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]



      

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org 
Send email to [email protected] 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en 
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

Reply via email to