Willem-Jan Markerink wrote: edited ... Hmm....a 400/4.0 divided by 2 is a 200/2.0....okay, that will do....:)) __________________________________________________________________ Even better, 400mm F2.8 divided by 2 yields a 200mm F1.6. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Ian Montgomery
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 ... Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 ... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70... Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS Any news on ... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Willem-Jan Markerink
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Daniel Rocha
- RE: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Rodrigo Gimenez
- RE: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Rodrigo Gimenez
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Richard Stephenson
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? John Gunderson
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Gary Russell
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 ... Patrice Chiniara
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 ... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Steve Krogh
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 ... Steve Krogh
