At 15:28 21/11/00 -0800, Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: >Even better, > >400mm F2.8 divided by 2 yields a 200mm F1.6. I think it is a 200mm f1.4, since 2.8/2 = 1.4 (or two stops faster than f2.8 is f1.4). Rodrigo Gimenez * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Ian Montgomery
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 ... Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 ... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70... Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS Any news on ... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Willem-Jan Markerink
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Daniel Rocha
- RE: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Rodrigo Gimenez
- RE: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Rodrigo Gimenez
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Richard Stephenson
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? John Gunderson
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Gary Russell
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 ... Patrice Chiniara
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 ... Daniel Rocha
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS l... Steve Krogh
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 ... Steve Krogh
- Re: EOS Any news on a 70-200 2.8 IS lens? Willem-Jan Markerink
