I'm still debating whether I will buy the 20mm f/2.8 or the 20-35, which
are roughly the same price.
The 20mm would take 72mm filters like my 28-135, and I don't think I would
miss the gap from 20 to 28mm.
What's nice about the 20-35 is that you can leave the other lenses at home
sometimes, and use the full 20-35 range, but a 77mm Hoya SMC Polarizer is
expensive.
Aaahhhh Choice...
Pierre
At 10:25 1/5/2001 +0900, you wrote:
>Congrats on the excellent choice of lens, I am enjoying my EF 20-35 very
>much, and use it more than any other lenses I have. Recently I photographed
>a group of people working outdoors and indoors making ricecakes here in
>Japan. I took only my EOS and EF 20-35 with 380EX. I shot at all different
>zoom lengths. Never did I want for another lens.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
