----- Original Message -----
From: Pierre Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: EOS New bag,and other stories - ON Topic
> I'm still debating whether I will buy the 20mm f/2.8 or the 20-35, which
> are roughly the same price.
>
> The 20mm would take 72mm filters like my 28-135, and I don't think I would
> miss the gap from 20 to 28mm.
>
> What's nice about the 20-35 is that you can leave the other lenses at home
> sometimes, and use the full 20-35 range, but a 77mm Hoya SMC Polarizer is
> expensive.
>
> Aaahhhh Choice...
>
> Pierre
I don't find I need any filters for the EF 20-35, it's sharp, contrasty, and
gives me great blue skies, etc. I also debated on getting either an EF 24,
EF 20, or the 20-35. I'm really glad I did get the EF 20-35. I find it hard
to move back and forward - often there's something in the way. Plus,
sometimes I want to get the shot - NOW. Framing with the zoom is a dream,
and the USM really rocks.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
