I haven't used the 20mm prime, but the 20-35 lens finally got me "into" wide
angle lenses. I shot sports and portraits so long I had trouble finding uses
for anything below 50mm, but this lens changed all that. I want to buy the
28-135, but I'm afraid I'll be disappointed by the "long" short end (and I'm
not really hot to need 72mm filters on top of 77's)!
I"m not sure of the Hoya designation, but you will probably want one of the
slim polarizers to avoid vignetting.
tomp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: EOS New bag,and other stories - ON Topic
> I'm still debating whether I will buy the 20mm f/2.8 or the 20-35, which
> are roughly the same price.
>
> The 20mm would take 72mm filters like my 28-135, and I don't think I would
> miss the gap from 20 to 28mm.
>
> What's nice about the 20-35 is that you can leave the other lenses at home
> sometimes, and use the full 20-35 range, but a 77mm Hoya SMC Polarizer is
> expensive.
>
> Aaahhhh Choice...
>
> Pierre
>
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
