Pierre Bellavance wrote:
>
> I'm still debating whether I will buy the 20mm f/2.8 or the 20-35, which
> are roughly the same price.
>
> The 20mm would take 72mm filters like my 28-135, and I don't think I would
> miss the gap from 20 to 28mm.
>
> What's nice about the 20-35 is that you can leave the other lenses at home
> sometimes, and use the full 20-35 range, but a 77mm Hoya SMC Polarizer is
> expensive.
>
> Aaahhhh Choice...
>
> Pierre
>
> I'm sort of dithering over the same thing. In fact my dithering has kept me from
>buying filters that I want, but don't necessarily need. I think the 20mm f2.8 would
>be the best choice on the short en, because I'd never leave the house with out my
>28=135. But I'm looking at some longer zoon teles that use 77mm filters. the
>question is whether to buy a 7- to 77 step up ring, and buy nothing but 77mm filters,
>or just go ahead and bet 72mm filters, and run the chance of duplicating the set if
>and when I get a longer lens. Hmmm...
Skip
--
Shadowcatcher Imagery
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
