--- "Austin, Joe (IMS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> How does the AF speed and accuracy compare across
> bodies like the EOS 3 ,1
> and A2. With a given USM lens , would AF
> performance be noticeably
> different?
Yes, the body makes a difference. How much difference
depends on the subject and lighting.
The 3 is noticeably better than either of the other
cameras in predictive AF. It seems somewhat better in
dim light, and with smaller aperture lenses.
In bright light, with a static, high contrast subject,
you'll never notice the difference. Shooting football
(either kind), or other fast moving action, the
difference is significant.
I've never compared the 1n and A2, but I believe the
1n has faster processers and better AF algorithms that
will also result in an improvement over the A2.
=====
Bob Meyer
Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
