On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:43:10 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>Do you mean the Photosmart? I had the original
>version of that scanner, and was actually pretty
>impressed. It certainly wasn't the equal of a $1500
>or better scanner, but it was pretty darn good.
>
>The biggest drawback was the software, which made it
>difficult to get the best possible adjustments out of
>the scanner.
>
>The new version is USB, rather than SCSI, and I
>understand it to be slower. But I think the
>software's been improved. And, for $40, you can get
>VueScan software off the web. In spite of a rather
>poor user interface, it's actually a very powerful
>tool.
>
>I'm afraid I can't compare the HP scanner to any other
>low-end models, however. HTH,
Thanks Bob - yes, PhotoSmart is what I meant. Appreciate the
feedback. So the scanner doesn't feed directly into a graphics app
such as Photoshop, but needs to go through proprietary software first?
Ken
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
