I think I'll have to redo my testing of these two lenses, by finding a
store that has them both, and take similar pictures with both of them on
the same film.
Pierre
At 16:10 2/9/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Julian,
>
>"Flare cutting diaphgram", is that what they call the rectangular mask?
>
>My lens list includes the 20-35/3.5-4.5, 35/2, 50/1.8 Mk. I, 85/1.8 ... BIG
>GAP ... and the 300/4L. I haven't taken any enlargements on the 20-35 past
>8x10 but from what I see, it holds its own against the rest of my primes. I
>was originally leaning towards the 20 but a 20-35 came up for sale at a
>prize I couldn't resist. As an aside, the 20-35 just won my wife their
>company's yearbook cover contest. I'm thinking of rewarding her with a
>missing must-have white zoom lens that perhaps I could borrow once in a
>while (see BIG GAP) above ;-)
>
>BTW, I use a slim Heliopan C-Pol with no problems.
>
>James
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
