> Purpose of lens: Panoramas, New York City, flowers, funny close-up > portraits with wide deep views of scenery or buildings, etc... If for nothing else then the 20mm wins because of its lower closest-focus-distance. Well, wins is the wrong word because really they are all tools with plusses and minuses. If getting close is not really an issue ... the equation shifts. Oh, the 20 has good flare control: it shows little evidence of fall-off but does vignette a bit wide open. By f8 it's fine. Clue: I bet the zooms do too. BobT * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- RE: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 jul . loke
- RE: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Wilson, James
- RE: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- EOS PMA News Daniel ROCHA
- Re: EOS PMA News Ken Lin
- Re: EOS PMA News Patrick Ward
- EOS Lens repair John M. Lovda
- RE: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Don Weiss
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- Re[2]: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Dieter Henkel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.... Jim Davis
