on 2/9/01 5:29 PM, Richard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have narrowed my decision to either the 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 or the 28-135
> f/3.5-5.6 IS. I'm looking for opinions on either of these two. Does either
> one have perform significantly better then the other? Does the "IS" really
> work? Does it degrade the image when in use?
I'd go for the 28-135. It is significantly better than the 24-85 optically,
and the IS feature really works. It doesn't degrade the image at all.
--
John Chennavasin | This article contains material which may inform and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | may be quoted, printed, forwarded, or redistributed
www.fobpro.com | as long as the original attribution remains intact.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
